USPTO serial 86289454
CENERO CONSTANT CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REAMS, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CENERO CONSTANT CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Hook
MICHAEL J. HOOK POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN, CARRLE AND LOMBARDO, P.C475 ALLENDALE RD STE 200KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1496UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and computer hardware for controlling and managing audiovisual hardware, software and display devices, both locally and within an intranet application and remotely over internet or cloud based networks for use in the fields of audio visual media and mediums, telecommunication, and video conferencing, specifically, software and hardware to address all areas of business involving the use of audio visual media, telecommunications, and video conferencing in support of business goals; Telecommunication products, namely, telecommunications software and hardware for controlling, enabling and managing telecommunications and video conferencing in support of business goals | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2009 |
| 038 | Providing technical support regarding the usage of communications equipment which is intended to address all areas of business involving the use of audio visual media, telecommunications, and video conferencing in support of business goals | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2009 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring proprietary software for remote video conferencing and related functions, namely, telecommunications and video conferencing in support of business goals; Rental of computer hardware; design of software and hardware for others for telecommunications and video conferencing in support of business goals; Technological consulting and design of computer software for others, in the fields of audio visual media and mediums, telecommunication, and video conferencing, specifically the provision of professional services, namely, application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications for others, and design of software for customized enterprise solutions for audio visual media and mediums, telecommunication, and video conferencing, including the design and development of computer hardware and software for the creation, use, and management of audio visual media and mediums, telecommunication, and video conferencing systems; Providing technical support, namely, administration and management of hardware and software which is intended to address all areas of business involving the use of telecommunications and video conferencing in support of business goals | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |