USPTO serial 86291092
IWALLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IWALLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
San Diego, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in tracking location or proximity of an electronic biometric locking portable storage case that protects personal belongings; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in providing biometric security protections to electronic biometric locking portable storage cases that protect personal belongings; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in tracking location or proximity of an electronic biometric locking portable storage case that protects personal belongings; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in providing biometric security protections to electronic biometric locking portable storage cases that protect personal belongings; (Based on Intent to Use) Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in blocking radio frequency identification (RFID) signals; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in remotely opening an electronic biometric locking portable storage case that protects personal belongings; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in facilitating payment transactions; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in storing, accessing, and using credit card, debit card, bank account, and other financial payment account details; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for encryption; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for the creation of firewalls; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in blocking radio frequency identification (RFID) signals; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in remotely opening an electronic biometric locking portable storage case that protects personal belongings; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in facilitating payment transactions; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in storing, accessing, and using credit card, debit card, bank account, and other financial payment account details; Rental of computer hardware; Rental of computer software | ACTIVE | Nov 10, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IWALLET CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by IWALLET CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by IWALLET ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by iWallet Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IWALLET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |