USPTO serial 86291108
FFF ENTERPRISES VERIFIED INVENTORY PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FFF ENTERPRISES VERIFIED INVENTORY PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Hollander
Susan E. Hollander Venable LLP505 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags and readers; RFID-based drug inventory and management system comprised of computer hardware and software and RFID tags and readers, antennas, and accessories, namely electrical connectors, adapters, and electric cables; computer software for use in RFID applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FFF Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FFF Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FFF ENTERPRISES VERIFIED INVENTORY PROGRAM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |