USPTO serial 86293749
FUSION RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUSION RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan Jeanne
MEGAN JEANNE THE CORPORATE LAW GROUP1342 ROLLINS RDBURLINGAME, CA 94010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bacon; Beef; Beef jerky; Beef patties; Beef slices; Bottled cooked meat; Bulgogi, namely, marinated barbecued beef; Canned cooked meat; Canned pork; Charcuterie; Chicken; Chicken nuggets; Corned beef; Dried beef; Dried fish; Dried meat; Extracts of meat; Extracts of poultry; Fish and meat preserves; Frankfurters; Fresh meat; Fresh poultry; Fried meat; Game; Game, not live; Grilled meat marinated in soy sauce; Ham; Hamburger; Hot dogs; Jerky; Kielbasa; Luncheon meats; Marinated meat, game, fish and poultry; Meat; Meat; Meat and meat extracts; Meat boiled down in soy sauce (tsukudani meat); Meat extract; Meat extracts; Meat paste; Meat preserves; Meat, fish, poultry and game preserves; Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; Meat, frozen; Meat, poultry and game; Meat-based snack foods; Mincemeat; Packaged meats; Pork; Pork cutlets; Pork tenderloin; Potted meats; Poultry; Poultry and game; Poultry, namely, chicken and turkey; Poultry, not live; Prepared beef; Prepared meat; Preserved fish; Preserved meats and sausages; Processed fish; Processed lamb; Processed meat; Processed meat, namely, meat, game, poultry, fish, seafood; Processed poultry; Processed seafood; Processed seafood, namely, fish; Refrigerated food package combinations consisting primarily of meat, cheese or processed vegetables for purposes of creating a sandwich; Ribs; Roast beef; Salami; Salted meat; Sausages; Seafood, not live; Seafoods boiled down in soy sauce (tsukudani); Seasoned meat, game, fish and poultry; Sliced and seasoned barbequed beef (bulgogi); Sliced meat; Smoked fish; Smoked shellfish; Tinned meat; Turkey; Turkey bacon; Turkey burger patties; Turkey sausages; Uncooked hamburger patties; Uncooked sausages; Veal; Wieners | ACTIVE | Jun 19, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fusion Ranch, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FUSION RANCH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FUSION RANCH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named FUSION RANCH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |