Drawing for SAN FRANCISCO FIRE

USPTO serial 86294717

SAN FRANCISCO FIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAN FRANCISCO FIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry Carleton

Jerry Carleton Immix Law Group PC121 SW Salmon St, Ste 1000Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Trading cards, pens, bumper stickers, posters, decorative decals for vehicle windows, temporary tattoo transfers, wall clings in the nature of vinyl static cling decals on which logos are printed for affixation to wallsACTIVE—
018Gym bags, athletic bags, tote bags, backpacksACTIVE—
021Mugs, drinking cups, glass beverageware, cozies, namely, thermal insulated wraps for bottles to keep contents cold, all purpose portable household containers, plastic or leather coasters, and shot glasses, bottles with internal agitators for mixing ingredients and shaker cups, travel coffee mugs, thermal insulated beverage containersACTIVE—
024Cloth flags for cars, cloth flags for houses, towelsACTIVE—
028Barbells, exercise weight plates, inflatable toy noise makers; playing cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 16, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 9, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance