Drawing for CRUNCHADDICTIVES

USPTO serial 86296433

CRUNCHADDICTIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRUNCHADDICTIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan M. Heinz

JORDAN M. HEINZ KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP300 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60654UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Baked nut, seed and dried fruit snack barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 19, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 19, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance