Drawing for AUTHENTIC THROWBACK APPLIANCE CO

USPTO serial 86297388

AUTHENTIC THROWBACK APPLIANCE CO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AUTHENTIC THROWBACK APPLIANCE CO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carrie Webb Olson

Carrie Webb Olson Day Pitney LLPOne International Place, 17th FloorBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electrically powered machines for household use, namely, electric food blenders, electric hand mixers for household purposes, electric food processors and electric food choppers; Dispensing machines, namely, vending machines for dispensing confectioneries and vending machines for dispensing snack foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 20, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 17, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 5, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 19, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 25, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 15, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 15, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance