USPTO serial 86297552
REGENCY FINE CHINA DESIGNED IN ENGLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERNS, LEE ANNE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REGENCY FINE CHINA DESIGNED IN ENGLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Central Hong Kon, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa K. Dagodag
MELISSA K. DAGODAG THE LAW OFFICES OF MELISSA K. DAGODAG468 N CAMDEN DR FL 2BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Beverage glassware; household storage containers of ceramic, stoneware and porcelain; baking dishes, dishes, plates, bowls, cups, serving dishes and mugs of ceramic, stoneware, porcelain, melamine and laminated resin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |