USPTO serial 86298978
NEUROQUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2016
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NEUROQUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Eastley
Sherri L. Eastley PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300AUSTIN, TX 78702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data collection systems comprised of computers, computer hardware, computer peripheral devices, computer software for collecting, analyzing and reporting psychophysiological responses to media input, scanners, cameras, electric sensors, computer or video monitors, and headphones; downloadable software for assessing and analyzing psychophysiological responses to media input; computer hardware and computer peripheral devices | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SmartScience Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SmartScience Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SmartScience Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NEUROQUBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 27, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 27, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |