Drawing for AERIS SECURE

USPTO serial 86299780

AERIS SECURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AERIS SECURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Matson

3165 E MILLROCK DR STE 500SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121-4704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing computer network security services and managed security services in the field of computing, namely, providing security analysis, security consulting, security assessment, security program assessment, and vulnerability assessment; computer security consultancy, namely, detecting, analyzing, and providing detailed assessment of and countermeasures against the invasion of intruders into computer networks; computer security services in the nature of incident mitigation and response, namely, detecting, analyzing and responding to the invasion of intruders into computer networks by providing detailed assessment and countermeasures; computer security services in the form of firewall security management, namely, detecting, analyzing, and providing detailed assessment of and countermeasures against firewall intrusion; content security management, namely, detecting, analyzing, and providing detailed assessment of and countermeasures against viruses, spyware, malicious code and malicious content on computer networks; information security management, namely, implementation of systems and procedures to protect the integrity and security of data and information on computer networks; computer security services, namely, network security architecture review and design for information systems, communication systems, telecommunication systems and wireless networksACTIVEMay 28, 2011
045Computer network security and managed security services in the field of computing, namely, firewall monitoring and monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; regulatory compliance and security consultancy in the field of payment card industry (PCI) data security laws and regulations for information systems, communication systems, telecommunication systems and wireless networks; intrusion detection management, namely, providing onsite and remote monitoring of network infrastructure and network activity for security purposesACTIVEMay 28, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance