Drawing for SECOND SKIN

USPTO serial 86301999

SECOND SKIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECOND SKIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa B. Lane

LISA B. LANE FOX ROTHSCHILD LLPPO BOX 5231PRINCETON, NJ 08543-5231UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing reality-based television program; entertainment services in the nature of a non-fiction television and non-downloadable online video programming series on topics relating to personal style and personal experiences in the fields of fashion, lifestyle and general interest, provided and accessible via television, cable, fiber optic, satellite, audio, video, and computer networks, web-based applications, and mobile phone applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 28, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 23, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 23, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance