USPTO serial 86302001
GLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GUANGDONG LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS IMP. & EXP. HOLDINGS CORP.
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Other trademarks owned by GUANGDONG LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS IMP. & EXP. HOLDINGS CORP.
GUANGDONG LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS IMP. & EXP. HOLDINGS CORP.
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Other trademarks owned by GUANGDONG LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS IMP. & EXP. HOLDINGS CORP.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
ROBERTO LEDESMA LAW OFFICE OF ROBERTO LEDESMAPO BOX 230692NEW YORK, NY 10023-0012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric fruit presses for household use; Mixing machines; Electric grinders for household purposes; blade holders being parts of grinder machines for household purposes; Electric food beaters; Electric whisks for household purposes; kitchen machines, namely, electric food processors; Centrifugal mills for food; Electric crushers for household use; Electric can openers; Electric coffee grinders; Electric food processors; Food Agitators; Dishwashers; Electric fruit and vegetable mixer; Electric pepper mills; Electric blenders for household purposes; electric marinade machine, namely, electric vacuum marinator | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Cloth, namely, cotton fabrics, linen, woolen cloth, Moleskin fabric not for medical use; Buckram; Velvet; Traced cloths for embroidery; Silk fabrics for printing patterns; Labels of cloth; Upholstery fabrics; Hemp cloth; Damask; Fabrics for textile use; Frieze; filtering materials of textile, namely, chemical fiber fabrics, synthetic fiber fabrics, inorganic fiber mixed fabrics all for use in filtering liquids and powders for kitchen use; Fabric for textile use; Hemp fabric; gauze fabric; Calico; Non-woven textile fabrics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GUANGDONG LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS IMP. & EXP. HOLDINGS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by GUANGDONG LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS IMP. & EXP. HOLDINGS CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named GLIP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |