Drawing for BETTER OFF WED

USPTO serial 86302342

BETTER OFF WED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTER OFF WED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela C. Wilcox

ANGELA C. WILCOX VANEK, VICKERS AND MASINI, PC55 W MONROE ST FL 35CHICAGO, IL 60603-5001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Cake toppers of common metalACTIVE—
014Jewelry, namely, rings, bracelets, wedding bands, earrings, necklaces, cuff links, watches; goods made from precious metals, namely, trinkets, key fobs, jewel cases, key rings, clocks, and cake toppersACTIVE—
016Printed matter and paper goods, namely, invitations, signs, stationery, greeting cards, writing papers, envelopes, books, memory boxes, planners, printed publications, namely, magazines, articles and newsletters in the field of weddings and wedding planning; guest books, photo albums, ring boxes, printed wedding signage and printed table number signageACTIVE—
020Wedding cake decorations, namely, plastic cake toppers; mirrors; picture frames; bridal accessories, namely, ring bearer pillowsACTIVE—
021Household utensils, namely, cake stands, cake servers, and cake serving spatulas; non-metal containers for household or domestic use; wedding cake decorations, namely, cake toppers made of, plastics, resins, china, porcelain, metals, glass, crystal, earthenware and terra cottaACTIVE—
025Apparel, namely, dresses, veils, garters, sashes, boutonnieres, pocket squares, lingerieACTIVE—
026Hair ornaments, hair pins, lace, embroidery, ribbons, artificial flowersACTIVE—
035Providing retail store services featuring wedding merchandise; mail order services featuring wedding merchandise; online retail store services featuring wedding merchandise; providing consumer information for others about wedding merchandise and wedding planning; advertising for others; advertising and business consulting services; advertising, marketing, promotion and publicity services for others; promoting the goods and services of others via sponsored links to third party websites; endorsement services, namely, promoting the goods and services of othersACTIVE—
041Providing information in the field of wedding party planning; Providing information regarding wedding reception planning for wedding parties; electronic publishing of on-line magazines, articles, periodicals, lifestyle, media content, and blogs in the field of weddings and wedding planning; providing on-line non downloadable electronic publications, namely, books, magazines, articles, brochures and e-zines in the field of weddings and wedding planning; online digital publishing services in the field of weddings and wedding planning; publishing online journals, namely, blogs featuring wedding planning information and personal opinions about wedding planning and weddingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 13, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 7, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 7, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance