USPTO serial 86305103
TGP PROCOLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TGP PROCOLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Snoqualmie, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cindy L. Caditz
CINDY L. CADITZ DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 2200SEATTLE, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Architectural glass, namely, structural glass, decorative glass, fire-rated glass, impact safety-rated glass, security glass, wired glass, sidelights, windows, transoms; Color coatings sold as an integral component of glass panels for building purposes; framing materials, namely, wood door frames, wood window frames, fire-rated window and door frames made of wood, immovable wall partitions; building materials, namely, millwork for doors, millwork for windows, non-metal doors; building surfacing materials, namely, ceramic wall cladding, non-metal wall cladding, synthetic wall cladding, ceramic countertops, ceramic flooring, glass floors, building glass; safety glass for building purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | wholesale distributorship services in the field of building products, glass, and glass framing products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |