Drawing for AAPN - ALL AMERICAN PLAYERS NETWORK

USPTO serial 86305682

AAPN - ALL AMERICAN PLAYERS NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AAPN - ALL AMERICAN PLAYERS NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samuel Fifer

SAMUEL FIFER DENTONS US LLPPO BOX 061080WILLIS DRIVE STATION WILLIS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programs and computer game software, including software downloadable from the Internet; mobile applications for gambling, amusement and entertainment services, namely, software for use in playing games of chance on cell phones, tablets and other handheld devices; interactive computer systems comprised of an interactive multimedia computer program for gaming and accessing gambling and gambling services, amusement and entertainment services, games, card games and casino games; magnetically encoded credit cards; magnetically encoded prepaid gift and debit cards; magnetically encoded charge cards and cards for use in obtaining discounts for goods and services; magnetically encoded loyalty rewards cards for use by members of loyalty programs; magnetically encoded goods and services discount cards for use in promotional programsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online casino, gaming, and gambling services; providing online non-downloadable virtual slot machines and other instant win games of chance; providing online casino games including roulette games, slot machines, blackjack, keno, baccarat, scratch cards and poker games; providing online poker network services, namely, providing online poker tournaments; online gaming services, namely, providing virtual multi-player card rooms by means of the Internet; organization, production and presentation of gaming and gambling tournaments, competitions and games and events in the nature of online and offline tournaments in the fields of gaming and gambling; entertainment and interactive Entertainment services, namely, providing ongoing television and radio programs in the field of gaming and providing online games of chance distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission media, including television, interactive television, telephony, mobile or handheld devices or provided online from a computer database or via the Internet; organization of entertainment and amusement events in the nature of gaming and gambling competitions and card games; advisory services and provision of information relating to all the aforesaid servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 10, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance