USPTO serial 86307687
BED BUG FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, JOHN PETER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BED BUG FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven T. Cooper
STEVEN T COOPER WARE FRESSOLA MAGUIRE & BARBER LLP755 MAIN STREETPO BOX 224 BRADFORD GREEN BUILDING FIVEMONROE, CT 06468Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbicides, insecticides, pesticides and fungicides for home, garden and lawn use and for professional use | ACTIVE | May 20, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |