Drawing for GET@

USPTO serial 86308000

GET@

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GET@?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nina Habib Borders

NINA HABIB BORDERS REED SMITH, LLP10 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-7453UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software, namely, graphical user interface software for accessing and browsing online digital media and information via mobile devices; computer software for processing electronic payments; software for providing a second screen experience that allows users to interact with radio, television and online programsACTIVE—
035Dissemination of advertising for others via an online communications network on the internet; online advertising services, namely, advertising services for matching buyers and sellers of advertising in the nature of online advertising network matching services for connecting advertisers to websites and to mobile applications, for tracking advertising performance, for managing, distributing, and serving advertisements, for analyzing advertising data, for reporting advertising data, and for optimizing advertising performanceACTIVE—
036Electronic commerce payment services, namely, providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer networkACTIVE—
042Providing a web site featuring on-line nondownloadable software development tools and application programming interface (API) software for use by developers and publishers for the creation of mobile internet applications and interfaces; software as a service featuring software for use in mobile targeting and retargeting for digital advertising and marketing; software as a service, namely, providing online nondownloadable software for providing a second screen experience that allows users to interact with radio, television and online programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 18, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 20, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance