Drawing for THE ARTSMITHS

USPTO serial 86308883

THE ARTSMITHS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ARTSMITHS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan H. Opalko

BRYAN H OPALKO BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC301 GRANT STREET FLOOR 20PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring handmade artisan products in the nature of original artwork in a wide variety of mediums; online retail store services featuring handmade artisan products in the nature of artwork in a wide variety of mediumsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 28, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 9, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 9, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance