Drawing for CEILING BREAKERS

USPTO serial 86308983

CEILING BREAKERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEILING BREAKERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrence J. McAllister

TERRENCE J. MCALLISTER OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE, LLP1 LANDMARK SQ FL 10STAMFORD, CT 06901-2619UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of career advancement for women, social issues, and healthcare advocacyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 27, 2016IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
May 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 6, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 30, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 30, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 3, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance