USPTO serial 86310767
TRYPTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTELL, BRITTANY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRYPTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6060 Hall in Tirol, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen C. Kassner
MAUREEN C. KASSNER PANITCH SCHWARZE BELISARIO & NADEL LLP2005 MARKET ST STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | vitamin and mineral beverages for use as food supplements; chewing gum for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | chewing gum | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | beers; mineral and aerated waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages, namely, beers, fruit drinks and fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |