Drawing for AIRNOTE

USPTO serial 86313543

AIRNOTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRNOTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in the manufacture of perfumery, insecticides, and fungicidesACTIVE
003Perfumery; fragrances; perfumes; essential oils; air fragrancing preparations; deodorants for human beings or for animals; perfumes, air fragrancing preparations contained in cartridges; deodorants for human beings or for animals, contained in cartridgesACTIVE
005Insecticides; fungicides; preparations for destroying vermin; disinfectants for sanitary purposes; air deodorizing preparations; air purifying preparations; insecticides, fungicides contained in cartridges; preparations for destroying vermin contained in cartridges; disinfectants for sanitary purposes, contained in cartridges; air deodorizing preparations, air purifying preparations contained in cartridgesACTIVE
007Insecticide spraying machines; spraying machinesACTIVE
011Air purifying apparatus and machines; air deodorizing apparatus; air conditioning installations; humidifier; air sterilisers; deodorizing apparatus, not for personal use; disinfectant apparatusACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 23, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 23, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 17, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 20, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 20, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 25, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 18, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 18, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 19, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 8, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 9, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 9, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 25, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 18, 2014AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Jul 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 10, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 21, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance