Drawing for IDONA

USPTO serial 86315024

IDONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frances M. Jagla

PARNA A MEHRBANI LANE POWELL PC601 SW SECOND AVENUESUITE 2100PORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic preparations; Topical herbal cream for firming and enhancing breasts; dermatologicals; creams and gels for the skin for cosmetic purposes; anti-aging creams; cosmetic preparations for skin care for clearing skin; Body oils; hair care preparations, perfumes and soapsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 11, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 14, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 8, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 15, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 21, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 5, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance