Drawing for SUPPLYINTEL

USPTO serial 86315176

SUPPLYINTEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPPLYINTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marlene J. Williams

MARLENE J. WILLIAMS NIXON PEABODY LLPPO BOX 26769SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-6769UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing information in the field of supply chain managementABANDONEDMar 15, 2013
042Providing on-line non-downloadable software for supply chain analysis and supply chain management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for supply chain analysis and supply chain managementABANDONEDMar 15, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2015MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2015ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance