USPTO serial 86315632
SCOOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCOOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Howard
JAMES E HOWARD100 BOSCH BLVDNEW BERN, NC 28562-6924UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Dishwashing machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |