USPTO serial 86315751
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya Marie Curcio
TANYA MARIE CURCIO VORYS SATER SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1909 K ST NW 9TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1152UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Messenger bags; Pouches for holding make-up, keys and other personal items; Pouches made out of cloth; Purses; Shoulder bags; Tote bags; Wallets; Wheeled tote bags; Wine carrying cases; Wristlet bags; all of the aforementioned goods made of canvas materials | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Collapsible fabric storage container for domestic use; General purpose storage bins for household use; Thermal insulated bags for food or beverages; Thermal insulated containers for food or beverages; all of the aforementioned goods made of canvas materials | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |