USPTO serial 86315804
MGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlotte, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J Ladenheim
Matthew J Ladenheim TREGO, HINES & LADENHEIM, PLLC9300 Harris Corners ParkwaySuite 210Charlotte, NC 28269Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a website for users to store, edit, and share photos; Peer-to-browser photo sharing services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload, view, and download digital photos; Providing a web site that gives users the ability to upload, exchange and share photos, videos and video logs; Providing a website that gives users the ability to review metadata stored within a digital photograph or video file; Providing a website that gives users the ability to store and retrieve data within a digital image file in the nature of who is in the image, why the image was taken, what is in the image, when the image was taken, and where the image was taken; Scanning of photographs and converting physical photographs to digital format files; Conversion of analog photography to digital format files; Conversion of physical photography to digital format files; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to annotate digital photograph files with stored metadata; providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to store and present historical data of digital photographs and videos using text or voice embedded in the photographs and video files; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to store audio and text data within digital photograph and video files; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to Store and retrieve data within a digital image file in the nature of who is in the image, why the image was taken, what is in the image, when the image was taken, and where the image was taken; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic digital media; Data conversion of computer program data or information; Data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; Data conversion of electronic information; Design and development of software and hardware for data and multimedia content conversion from and to different protocols; Development and creation of computer programs for data processing; Providing a website for users to write digital format files to a data storage medium, upload photographs to the internet, and retrieve stored photographs from the internet; Providing a website for users to enhance the color of digital photographs and digital videos; Providing a website which displays in digital animation, a photograph rotating to its back side or a video playing at its end credits, and further displays options to embed text or audio files into the photograph or video file; Providing a website for users to save metadata to digital photograph files; Providing a website for users to store text and audio data to digital photograph files; Providing a website for users to integrate data fields into digital photograph files; Providing a website for users to edit metadata stored within digital photograph files; Providing a website for users to access, view, and download image files containing metadata for who is in the image, why the image was taken, what is in the image, when the image was taken, and where the image was taken; Providing a website for users to access, view, and download digital photograph files containing metadata for who is in the photo, why the photo was taken, what is in the photo, when the photo was taken, and where the photo was taken | ACTIVE | Jun 19, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |