Drawing for BEAUTY VICTIM

USPTO serial 86316036

BEAUTY VICTIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAUTY VICTIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchel S Kay, Esq..

Mitchel S Kay, Esq.. Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, LLP99 Wood Ave. South, 4th FloorIselin, NJ 08830UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, specifically, nail polish, nail care preparations, eye shadow, lipstick, lip gloss, facial makeup, fragrances, namely, perfumes and colognes, mascara, non-medicated skin care preparations, hair care preparations, shampoos, hair coloring, and non-medicated hair treatment styling preparations for cosmetic preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 11, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 11, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2015IULNITU LETTER MAILED, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Sep 18, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance