Drawing for FARMTABLE KITCHEN MICHAEL MINA & DON PINTABONA

USPTO serial 86316336

FARMTABLE KITCHEN MICHAEL MINA & DON PINTABONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARMTABLE KITCHEN MICHAEL MINA & DON PINTABONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. McCue

MICHAEL J MCCUE LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLPSTE 6003993 HOWARD HUGHES PKWYLAS VEGAS, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services; bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 29, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 11, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 17, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 17, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance