Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 86316456?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/86316456. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns THE BIG KETCH?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 86316456, the listed owner(s) include: The Big Ketch One, LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 86316456?

Serial number 86316456 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark THE BIG KETCH. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover THE BIG KETCH?

The public record lists International Classes: 043. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 86316456

THE BIG KETCH

Q: What is the current status of THE BIG KETCH?

THE BIG KETCH (86316456) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jun 20, 2014
Status date: Sep 27, 2016
Registration date: —
Examiner: ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BIG KETCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

The Big Ketch One, LLC
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by The Big Ketch One, LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin W Grierson

KEVIN W GRIERSON CULHANE MEADOWS PLLC2736 HOLLY RIDGE LANEWILLIAMSBURG, VA 23185UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
043	Restaurant services, namely the provision of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises	ACTIVE	Sep 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 27, 2016	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Sep 27, 2016	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Sep 27, 2016	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 22, 2016	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jun 16, 2016	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jun 16, 2016	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jun 16, 2016	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
May 23, 2016	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
May 23, 2016	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 19, 2016	NREV	NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED	—
May 19, 2016	PGTT	PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED	—
May 12, 2016	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
May 2, 2016	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
May 2, 2016	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2016	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Mar 1, 2016	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2016	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2015	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Aug 4, 2015	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2015	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2015	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jul 6, 2015	NREV	NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED	—
Jul 6, 2015	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 6, 2015	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 6, 2015	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2015	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jul 6, 2015	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 4, 2015	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2015	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2015	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2015	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Oct 5, 2014	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2014	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2014	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2014	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 28, 2014	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Jun 24, 2014	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—