USPTO serial 86317340
SEAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, JOHN PETER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Fraser
JENNIFER FRASER NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP1875 EYE ST NW FL 11WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5409UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | computer security systems training, and educational services, namely, conducting computer-based classes, seminars, workshops in the field of cyber security and distribution of training material in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | research in the field of cyber intelligence technology and cyber security technology; computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities; computer security consultancy, namely, development of customized plans for improving computer security and preventing criminal activity; engineering and system analysis in the field of computer systems; security engineering consultancy in the field of security needs assessment and security cost estimates; technical consulting services in the fields of computer security system architecture, evaluation and implementation of computer security technology and services; computer security and privacy risk analysis, mitigation, and management; computer security consulting, namely, penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, security planning, security testing, developing security requirements, securing coding standards, conducting static and dynamic computer system analysis, collecting security metrics and analyzing threat vulnerabilities for identification and modeling; testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills and abilities of others for the purpose of certification and re-certification in the field of computer security; computer disaster planning and recovery; computer system design services; computer security system and architecture design | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | computer security consulting services in the field of systems engineering, security engineering and computer architecture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |