Drawing for VETS CENTRAL

USPTO serial 86318451

VETS CENTRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VETS CENTRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul D. Supnik

PAUL D. SUPNIK LAW OFFICE OF PAUL D. SUPNIK9401 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1250BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2945UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for veterinarians to provide televeterinary services, for veterinary class instruction, and database programs; software for veterinary medicine allowing pet owners to get advice electronically, for communication with other veterinarians to provide televeterinary services, for veterinary class instruction and database programs; software for purchasing prescribed medications for animals; mobile apps for use in connection with veterinary medicine allowing pet owners to get advice electronically, for communication with other veterinarians to provide televeterinary services, for veterinary class instruction and database programs; software for communicating live video and images between veterinary clinics; software for communicating between animal owners and veterinary clinicsACTIVE—
035Online retail and wholesale veterinary pharmacy services; retail and wholesale veterinary pharmacy services; online retail and wholesale veterinary pharmacy services featuring veterinary prescribed foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 18, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 5, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 14, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 10, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 19, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 18, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 10, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance