USPTO serial 86318622
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Costa Mesa, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACK P. FRIEDMAN
JACK P. FRIEDMAN SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS, LLP22 CENTURY HILL DR STE 302LATHAM, NY 12110-2137UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Beans, namely, dried beans; peas, namely, dried peas; dried lentils; potato vada, namely, potato fritters; meat dishes, namely, prepared dishes consisting principally of meat; cooked vegetables and dals in the nature of lentils and legumes, all cooked; frozen vegetables; dinner entrees, namely, frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; coconut, namely, desiccated coconut and flaked coconut; dried snacks, namely, dried fruits, dried vegetables, and dried lentils; ready to eat Mexican food, Chinese food, Italian food, Thai food, namely, ready to eat meals comprised primarily of meats, cheese, and also including rice, pasta, vegetables; shelf stable, frozen and packaged entrees consisting primarly of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables in the nature of Mexican food, Chinese food, Italian food, Thai food; pastes, namely, vegetable paste; roasted snacks, namely, roasted nuts; potato snacks, namely, potato-based snack foods; soy snacks, namely, soy-based snack foods; tamarind paste; ghee in the nature of purified butter; fruit pulp, namely, mango pulp; fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of foods, namely, mango concentrates, guava, lychee; cooking paste, namely, garlic paste and ginger paste; nuts, namely, roasted nuts; processed vegetables, namely, dehydrated onions; processed garbanzo beans in the nature of roasted garbanzo beans | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Papads, namely, flat bread with lentils; frozen foods, namely grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapes; Rice and curry meals, namely, meals consisting primarily of rice, and rice and lentils; flat breads stuffed with potatoes, cauliflower, radish, vegetables; flaky flat breads, namely, parathas; frozen snack foods, namely, samosas, spring rolls, kachori, in the nature of a stuffed pastry; dinner entrees, namely, frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta, rice and vegetables; processed grains, namely, flattened rice; pastes, namely, curry paste and almond paste; naan pizza, namely, pizza made with naan; breads, namely, chapatti, roti, poori; processed grains, poha flattened rice; puffed rice, namely, mamra, pauha; ginger paste for use as a seasoning; garlic paste for use as a seasoning; tomato catsup; cooking paste, namely, curry paste and almond paste; nuts, namely, almonds, pistachios, walnuts, peanuts, brazil nuts; tapioca; tapioca flour; syrups, namely, rose syrup; sooji, namely, processed semolina; processed semolina; asafetida in the nature of Hing; pani puri, namely, puffed pastry | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juice concentrates, namely, mango concentrates, guava and lychee; essence water, namely, essences for the preparation of mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |