Drawing for LETV

USPTO serial 86320283

LETV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LETV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Anna McCoy

B ANNA MCCOY McCoy Russell LLP806 SW BroadwaySuite 600Portland, OR 97205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, e-books, newsletters, manuals, magazines, pamphlets, newspapers, brochures, journals, texts, computer software and computer hardware; Recorded computer-gaming software; Computer software to enable uploading, downloading, accessing, posting, displaying, tagging, blogging, streaming, linking, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information via computer and communication networks; Computer software for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; Video game software; Portable telephones; Set-top boxes; Televisions; Portable media players; Camcorders; Transparency projection apparatus; Downloadable music files; Downloadable image file containing artwork, text, audio, video, games and Internet Web links relating to sporting and cultural activitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 25, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 24, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 3, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 11, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 7, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 7, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance