USPTO serial 86320411
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randel S. Springer
RANDEL S. SPRINGER WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP1 W 4TH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101-3818UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer and technical support services, namely, remote and on-site monitoring and management of cloud computing information technology and application systems of others | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2014 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |