USPTO serial 86320539
STEELCENTRAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5628049Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2018
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STEELCENTRAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. W. Wong
David A. W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer networking hardware; computer software for the operation of computers; computer software used to monitor and manage the performance of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols used in wide area, local area, or global networks; computer software used to monitor, test, enhance, accelerate, and manage the performance of wide area, local area, or global networks; embedded server software sold as an integral component of computer hardware used to monitor and manage the performance of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols used in wide area, local area, or global networks; embedded server software sold as an integral component of computer hardware used to monitor and manage the performance of wide area, local area, or global networks; computer software used to monitor, analyze, manage, assess and anticipate network performance trends, troubleshoot, record, and enhance the performance and security of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols of computer networks; computer software for installing, monitoring, managing, troubleshooting, diagnosing, verifying, and supporting telecommunication networks and related network services; computer software allowing collection, archiving, normalization, reporting, and analysis of network and infrastructure data, namely, topology, configuration, performance, and traffic data, and other related application performance data; computer software for network management and troubleshooting for use in the fields of information technology, telecommunications, software development, and software testing; computer software for network simulation; computer software that monitors and analyzes web-based applications to allow users to better understand the end-user experience and maximize end-user performance; computer software in the field of web analytics that collects, manages, integrates, analyzes, monitors, and tracks the performance of websites through web user behavior; computer software for analyzing the application components that comprise an executed transaction end-to-end; computer software for proactively monitoring and auditing activity and usage between users and databases; computer software for use in monitoring, diagnosing, and analyzing the performance of multi-tier applications; computer software for the transfer of data over private and public networks and the global computer network; computer software systems for network performance management; computer software for transmitting and sharing of global network traffic data and information across computer networks; computer software for optimizing and managing the performance, security, and delivery of computer application traffic, computer applications, websites, and data over networks; computer software for use in the electronic transmission of computer applications and data across computer networks; computer software for computer network traffic management; computer software for providing traffic management, application acceleration, application and network security, and server optimization; computer software used to deliver, deploy and manage software applications and data over computers networks; operating system software that facilitates application, website and data deployment, management, security and access across computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 14, 2014 |
| 042 | application service provider featuring software for use in the operation of computers; application service provider featuring software used to monitor and manage the performance of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols used in wide area, local area, or global networks; application service provider featuring software used to monitor, test, enhance, accelerate, and manage the performance of wide area, local area, or global networks; application service provider featuring software used to monitor and manage the performance of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols used in wide area, local area, or global networks; application service provider featuring software used to monitor, analyze, manage, assess and anticipate network performance trends, troubleshoot, record, and enhance the performance and security of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols of computer networks; application service provider featuring software for installing, monitoring, managing, troubleshooting, diagnosing, verifying, and supporting telecommunication networks and related network services; application service provider featuring software allowing collection, archiving, normalization, reporting, and analysis of network and infrastructure data, namely, topology, configuration, performance, and traffic data, and other related application performance data; application service provider featuring software for network management and troubleshooting for use in the fields of information technology, telecommunications, software development, and software testing; application service provider featuring software for network simulation; application service provider featuring software that monitors and analyzes web-based applications to allow users to better understand the end-user experience and maximize end-user performance; application service provider featuring software in the field of web analytics that collects, manages, integrates, analyzes, monitors, and tracks the performance of websites through web user behavior; application service provider featuring software for analyzing the application components that comprise an executed transaction end-to-end; application service provider featuring software for proactively monitoring and auditing activity and usage between users and databases; application service provider featuring software for use in monitoring, diagnosing, and analyzing the performance of multi-tier applications; application service provider featuring software for the transfer of data over private and public networks and the global computer network; application service provider featuring software for network management; application service provider featuring software for transmitting and sharing of global network traffic data and information across computer networks; application service provider featuring software for optimizing and managing the performance, security, and delivery of computer application traffic data, computer applications, websites, and data over networks; application service provider featuring software for use in the electronic transmission of computer applications and data across computer networks; application service provider featuring software for computer network traffic management; application service provider featuring software for providing traffic management, application acceleration, application and network security, and server optimization; application service provider featuring software used to deliver, deploy and manage software applications and data over computers networks; application service provider featuring software that facilitates application, website and data deployment, management, security and access across computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 14, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Riverbed Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Riverbed Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Riverbed Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STEELCENTRAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 19, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |