Drawing for GOLDENBERRY

USPTO serial 86321169

GOLDENBERRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDENBERRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ira Cohen, Esq.

IRA COHEN HENKEL & COHEN P A18001 OLD CUTLER RD STE 600MIAMI, FL 33157-6444UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031fresh fruitsACTIVEJan 15, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 19, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 19, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 20, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 14, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 25, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 13, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 13, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 4, 2016ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2016RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Feb 1, 2016RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2016RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 18, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance