Drawing for FOCUSING ON WHAT'S RIGHT

USPTO serial 86321188

FOCUSING ON WHAT'S RIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOCUSING ON WHAT'S RIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra MacKay

ALEXANDRA MACKAY STITES & HARBISON, PLLC401 COMMERCE ST STE 800NASHVILLE, TN 37219-2490UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Medical cost management; healthcare cost management services for healthcare benefit plans for others; healthcare utilization management services; healthcare utilization and review services; managed care services, namely, utilization review and pre-certification services; organization and administration of networks of preferred healthcare providers, namely, arranging of managed care contractual services in the fields of diagnostic imaging, radiation therapy, ultrasound services, sleep management testing and treatment, cardiac rhythm device care, post-acute care management, musculoskeletal care, and diagnostic lab servicesACTIVE—
036Organization and administration of networks of preferred healthcare providers, namely, claims administration services in the field of health insuranceACTIVE—
044Medical services and managed healthcare services; managed healthcare services; consulting services in the field of healthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 8, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 8, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance