Drawing for TEXAS HOG WARS

USPTO serial 86322408

TEXAS HOG WARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEXAS HOG WARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

JORDAN A. LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.1600 JFK BLVD FL 2PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2808UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about hunting and outdoor recreational activities accessible by radio, television, satellite, audio, video and computer networks; Entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of hunting and outdoor recreational activities; Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing reality based television program; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles in the field(s) of hunting and outdoor recreational activities; Providing a website featuring information about hunting; Provision of information in the field of leisure activities, namely, hunting and outdoor recreational activities; Provision of information in the field of recreational activities, namely, hunting and outdoor recreational activitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance