Drawing for STRAIGHT TALK STATEMENT

USPTO serial 86322744

STRAIGHT TALK STATEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRAIGHT TALK STATEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ashley B. Summer

ASHLEY B SUMMER NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP100 N TRYON ST FL 42CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Consumer lending services; consumer financial services in the nature of money lending, check cashing, deferred deposits, financial overdraft protection, and short-term consumer loansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 25, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 31, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 31, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 30, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance