Drawing for EDEFM

USPTO serial 86323126

EDEFM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDEFM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose

BRAD D. ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN LLP7 TIMES SQ FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10036-6569UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized online ordering services in the fields of musical sound recordings, audio-visual recordings, clothing, clothing accessories, provided by means of a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 2, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance