USPTO serial 86323359
DIVE N' SURF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIVE N' SURF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redondo Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Coester
PETER B BROMAGHIM BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Beach towels | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1991 |
| 025 | clothing, namely, outerwear, namely coats and jackets; T-shirts; gloves; jerseys; caps; hats; swim suits; dresses; skirts; blouses; shoes; and wet suits | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1980 |
| 035 | Retail store services and online retail store services featuring clothing, beach towels, and wetsuits | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |