USPTO serial 86323495
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simor L. Moskowitz
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ WESTERMAN HATTORI DANIELS & ADRIAN LLP1250 CONNECTICUT AVE NWSTE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036-2657| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | distributorship services in the field of wine, spirits and other alcoholic beverages" | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 12, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |