USPTO serial 86323655
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mohammad S. Rahman
Mohammad S. Rahman RAHMAN LLC5850 Waterloo RoadSuite 140COLUMBIA, MD 21045| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible shortening; liquid fry shortening; edible oil; sunflower oil; soy-based liquid frying oil; canola oil; solid shortening; frying shortening; vegetable fry shortening; animal fry shortening; donut fry shortening; lard; vegetable shortening; cake shortening; pie shortening; danish shortening; salad oil; canola salad oil; olive oil; canola oil; corn oil; corn salad oil; cottonseed salad oil; peanut oil; soybean salad oil; liquid margarine; coconut oil; liquid baking release, namely, liquid pan coating sprays and aerosols; liquid butter; soy based liquid butter; sodium free butter; liquid butter with garlic; bun toasting corn oil; salted butter; unsalted butter; whipped butter; firm butter; butter and margarine blend; multi-colored butter blend; multicolored margarine blend; solid butter; butter pats; butter chips; butter; margarine pats; unsalted margarine; margarine; garlic spread; soft margarine; margarine spread; whipped margarine; margarine blend; liquid garlic margarine; firm margarine; whipped margarine oil; white margarine non-dairy margarine; roll-in margarine; flavored spreadable margarine; pastry margarine; frozen vegetables | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2013 |
| 030 | Mayonnaise; edible dressing, namely, coleslaw dressing and salad dressing; flavored salad dressing; salad dressing; light salad dressing; fat free salad dressing; salad dressings, namely, ranch dressing, blue cheese dressing, French with honey dressing, creamy dressing, Italian dressing, honey dressing, Caesar dressing, balsamic vinaigrette dressing, vinaigrette dressing, Caribbean vinaigrette dressing, Cabernet vinaigrette dressing, raspberry vinaigrette dressing, sesame oriental dressing, parmesan peppercorn dressing, 1000 island dressing, 1001 island dressing, French dressing, ranch with tabasco dressing, honey mustard dressing, Dijon dressing, Dijon honey mustard dressing, buttermilk ranch dressing, kahlena French dressing, oriental dressing, poppy seed dressing, and garlic balsamic vinaigrette dressing; cole slaw dressing; tartar sauce; cocktail sauce; edible sauce; taco sauce; barbeque sauce; jalapeno sauce; jalapeno salsa; picante salsa; sweet and sour sauce; soy sauce; vinegar and spice sauce; condiments, namely, ketchup; mustard; hot mustard; relish; corn syrup; honey; rice; parboiled rice; long grain rice; basmati rice; wheat flour, whole wheat flour; sugar; French mustard; yellow mustard; light mayonnaise; honey spread | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2013 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |