Drawing for SKYLA (LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM)

USPTO serial 86324241

SKYLA (LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYLA (LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Gitchel

Jeffrey M. Gitchel Bayer Corporation100 Bayer RoadTrademarksPittsburgh, PA 15205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceuticals, namely, hormonal preparations comprised in whole or significant part of levonorgestrelACTIVE—
010Medical device, namely, an intrauterine device for contraceptionACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely, brochures and information cards, all in the field of women's health, birth control and reproductive optionsACTIVE—
044Providing a website featuring general and educational information in the field of women's health, birth control and reproductive options; providing general and educational information in the field of women's health, birth control and reproductive optionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2014TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jul 21, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance