USPTO serial 86324859
CISCO INTERCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CISCO INTERCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel, Esq.
SALLY M. ABEL, ESQ. FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer networking hardware; computer software for data centers and cloud computing service providers that enables them to operate, maintain, manage and deploy cloud computing resources; computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; computer network security software; computer software for accessing and using cloud computing networks, for operating and maintaining computer networks and servers, and for managing and deploying cloud computing resources; computer network operating software; computer software development tools; website development software; computer software that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface; computer software for developing and operating cloud computer networks and applications; computer software for use in database management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; platform-as-a-service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for cloud computing; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for developing and operating cloud computer networks and applications; software as a service (SAAS) featuring business and network analytics software for managing computer networks and telecommunications networks, providing data security, monitoring network performance, and collecting and analyzing network usage data and customer activity data; software-as-a-service (SAAS) featuring software that enables telecommunications network service providers, organizations and enterprises to operate, optimize, configure, maintain, monitor, manage and deploy software over networks; infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) featuring software for developing, managing, operating, monitoring, troubleshooting and configuring private cloud computer networks, managing network storage, and for deploying and installing software applications over networks; cloud computing services featuring software for use in deploying and managing software applications; server hosting services; application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; cloud hosting provider services; electronic data storage; providing on-line non-downloadable operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; providing on-line non-downloadable software for software development and website development; providing on-line non-downloadable software for operating and maintaining computer networks and servers and for network security; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in tracking, reporting, managing, allocating and deploying cloud computing resources; application service provider (ASP), namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, web sites and databases for others in the field of cloud computing; computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for database management and electronic storage of data; consulting services in the fields of cloud computing, information technology, computer hardware and software; providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of Internet technology and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cisco Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cisco Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CISCO INTERCLOUD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |