CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for COLORFLY

USPTO serial 86325320

COLORFLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5633103Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2018
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with COLORFLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Natalie A. Ward

Natalie A. Ward Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP2555 Grand Blvd.Kansas City, MO 64108United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020outdoor pillowsACTIVEDec 11, 2014
024bedspreads, comforters, bed sheets, pillow shams, pillow cases, duvet covers, sold as a unit featuring duvet covers and pillow shams, dust ruffles, draperies, fabric valances, foam back draperies, black out draperies, throws, unfitted fabric chair covers, table covers, table cloths not of paper, textile table napkins, towels, embroidered curtains, lace curtains, velvet curtains, outdoor draperies and kitchen curtainsACTIVEDec 11, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 22, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2018SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED—
Nov 13, 2018CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 13, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 6, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 6, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 25, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 25, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 17, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 29, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 23, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 23, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 24, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 23, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 23, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 21, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Jul 20, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 15, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jun 24, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jun 7, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 6, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2015ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2015FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2015ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance