Drawing for Serial No. 86327286

USPTO serial 86327286

Serial No. 86327286

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 86327286?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol Anne Been

CAROL ANNE BEEN DENTONS US LLPP.O. Box #061080Wacker Drive Station, Willis TowerChicago, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for cooking, namely, robotic cooking devices, namely, charcoal grills, cooking ovens; robotic kitchen modules comprising a stovetop, oven, sink, utensils, and a pair of fully articulated robotic armsACTIVE—
021Apparatus for cooking, namely, robotic cooking devices, composed of a handle and kitchenware head used in connection with kitchen appliances and cookware to assist in food preparation and cooking; robotic cooking devices composed of one or more robotic hands, one or more wrists and one or more robotic arms, body for gripping onto, moving, and placing kitchen appliances and cookware to assist in food preparation and cooking; Apparatus for cooking, namely, robotic cooking devices, namely, smart pans, cookware, namely, pots and pansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 22, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 2, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 17, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 4, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 4, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2014AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance