USPTO serial 86327317
HOME CARE ASSISTANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAZZELLA, BRANDY BARRETT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME CARE ASSISTANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel H. Bliss
DANIEL H BLISS HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC450 W 4TH STROYAL OAK, MI 48067-2557UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | FRANCHISE SERVICES, NAMELY, OFFERING BUSINESS MANAGEMENT IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF BUSINESSES OFFERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR MENTALLY OR PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED PEOPLE; FRANCHISE SERVICES, NAMELY, ADVICE IN THE RUNNING OF ESTABLISHMENTS AS FRANCHISES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS OFFERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR MENTALLY OR PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED PEOPLE; FRANCHISE SERVICES, NAMELY, BUSINESS CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF BUSINESSES OFFERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR MENTALLY OR PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED PEOPLE | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ESTABLISHING AND OPERATING BUSINESSES OFFERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR MENTALLY OR PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED PEOPLE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |