USPTO serial 86327544
CEN BIOTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CEN BIOTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lakeshore, Ontario, CA
Lakeshore, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey P. Thennisch
7111 DIXIE HWY # 210CLARKSTON, MI 48346-2077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific Research Services; Industrial Research Services, Namely, Research, Analysis, And Testing In The Field Of Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, And Nutritional Supplements; Scientific And Technological Services, Namely, Scientific Research, Analysis, And Testing In The Field Of Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, And Nutritional Supplements; Scientific Research And Development In The Area Of Agriculture, Biology, Biochemistry, Chemistry, Horticulture, Medicine, And Pharmacy; Planning And Executing Projects In The Area Of The Supply Of Pharmaceuticals, Namely, The Development And Formulation Of Pharmaceutical Compositions, Dosage Ranges And Delivery Methods Intended For Wholesale And Retail Sale To Individual And Institutional Consumers; Product Development Consultation In The Field Of Agricultural, Horticultural, And Pharmaceutical Products; Pharmaceutical Research And Development Services; Advisory, Consultancy, And Provision Of Technical Information For The Agricultural, Chemical, And Pharmaceutical Industries, Namely, The Development And Formulation Of Pharmaceutical Compositions, Dosage Ranges And Delivery Methods Intended For Wholesale And Retail Sale To Individual And Institutional Consumers, Research Into The Exploitation Of Naturally-Occurring Agricultural And Horticultural Products And The Development Of Extracts Therefrom | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 6, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |