Drawing for MARIS POLYMERS POLYURETHANE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 86327546

MARIS POLYMERS POLYURETHANE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARIS POLYMERS POLYURETHANE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto Ledesma

ROBERTO LEDESMA LAW OFFICE OF ROBERTO LEDESMAPO BOX 230692NEW YORK, NY 10023-0012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Insulating paints; Acrylic resins; thermal Insulators and Insulators, namely, polyurethane film for use in sealing and insulating buildings, namely, polyethylene and co-extruded polypropylene film not for wrapping, plastic film not for wrapping, and polyurethane substances for insulating buildings against moisture; Insulating materials; Insulating fabrics; Insulating Varnish; Fiberglass Fabrics for insulation; Rubber, namely, Packing cushioning, stuffing materials of rubber or plastics, Padding materials of rubber or plastics, Rubber stoppers, Stuffing of rubber or plastic; gutta-percha; gum, asbestos, mica and goods made from these materials and not included in other classes; plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture; packing, stopping and insulating materials; flexible pipes, not of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance